EXPERIENCED WINNIPEG CRIMINAL LAWYER

Robbery Lawyer in Winnipeg

Get a Free Case Evaluation
In Canada, robbery stands out as a particularly grave criminal offence. Unlike other theft-related crimes, it involves the use or threat of violence to acquire property, making it a serious violation of both personal safety and property rights.". This combination of theft with force or intimidation elevates robbery to a severe crime, carrying the potential for significant penalties, including lengthy imprisonment. The exact consequences can vary based on specific factors, such as the use of firearms, involvement with criminal organisations, or prior convictions.

Given the gravity of robbery charges, it is crucial to seek experienced legal representation. A knowledgeable lawyer, particularly one with extensive experience in handling robbery cases, is essential in navigating the complexities of the legal system and working towards the best possible outcome. Wiebe Criminal Defence, with its strong track record in defending clients against violent and theft-related charges, including robbery, is a reliable choice. Our firm is committed to thorough preparation, which is key to building a robust defence strategy. This ensures that we meticulously examine every aspect of the case.

Get Legal Representation with Experienced Robbery Defence Lawyers in Winnipeg

What Is Robbery?

Under Section 343 of the Criminal Code, robbery is defined as theft combined with violence or the threat of violence. It involves not just taking property but also using force, intimidation, or assault. This distinguishes robbery from other theft-related offences, making it a more serious crime with heavier penalties.

Someone is guilty of robbery if they:

  • commit theft while using violence or threats to prevent resistance;
  • use violence, such as wounding or striking, immediately before, during, or after the theft;
  • assault someone with the intent to steal; or
  • commit theft while armed with a weapon or an imitation weapon.

Practically, this can take the form of a threat of violence, such as brandishing a weapon or a physical act, such as carjacking, mugging or even a bank heist. The defining element is the use of force, threats, or weapons to facilitate the theft. Even if no physical harm occurs, the victim’s fear of harm is enough to make it robbery.

What Is Armed Robbery?

Armed robbery is a more severe form of robbery that specifically involves the presence and/or use of a weapon or imitation weapon during the commission of the crime. Under Section 343(d) of the Criminal Code, someone commits armed robbery while:

  • Carrying a weapon: This includes firearms, knives, or any other object that can be used to cause harm.
  • Carrying an imitation weapon: Even if the weapon isn’t real, if it’s used to create a reasonable fear of harm, it counts as armed robbery.

This classification is part of the broader legal definition of robbery, which includes any theft that involves violence or the threat of violence. The presence of a weapon during a robbery significantly elevates the severity of the crime, increasing both the legal consequences and the potential for harm. 

What Is Aggravated Robbery?

Although not explicitly defined in the Criminal Code, aggravated robbery is a more severe form of robbery involving factors like excessive violence, the use of a firearm, or causing significant bodily harm to the victim. Several key aggravating factors can lead to more severe charges and penalties, including:

  • Use of a Weapon: Particularly the use of a firearm or prohibited firearm that escalates both the danger and the legal consequences.
  • Causing Bodily Harm or Death: Inflicting severe physical harm or causing death during the robbery.
  • Group Involvement: Participating in the robbery as part of a group or criminal organisation.
  • Prior Criminal Convictions: A history of similar offences can lead to more stringent sentencing, reflecting the repeat nature of the criminal behaviour.
  • Targeting Vulnerable Victims: Crimes against vulnerable individuals, such as children or the elderly.

These aggravating factors not only heighten the seriousness of the robbery charge but also contribute to the likelihood of facing more severe legal consequences, including longer imprisonment.

Potential Defences Against Robbery Charges in Winnipeg

Robbery charges are complex, and the right defence depends on the specific circumstances of the case. An experienced lawyer can explore potential defences tailored to your unique situation, including alibi, lack of intent, or Charter rights violations. We’re committed to protecting your rights and achieving the best possible outcome.

Building an Alibi Defence

Establishing a solid alibi can be your strongest defence. An alibi defence argues that you were in a different location at the time the robbery took place, making it impossible for you to have committed the crime. To be persuasive, your defence needs to be backed by credible evidence, such as witness statements, video recordings, or other documentation, such as receipts verifying your whereabouts. A well-supported alibi can substantially undermine the prosecution’s case and, if it introduces reasonable doubt about your involvement, could result in an acquittal.

Demonstrating Absence of Intent

A key element of a robbery charge is proving that you had the intent to commit the crime. To secure a conviction, the prosecution must establish intent beyond a reasonable doubt. Your defence can counter this by presenting evidence or circumstances that suggest you did not intend to commit robbery, such as misunderstandings, lack of planning, or coercion. Demonstrating the absence of intent can weaken the prosecution’s case, potentially leading to amended charges or an acquittal.

Questioning the Accuracy of Identification

In robbery cases, misidentification is a common issue, especially when disguises or brief interactions are involved. Your defence can question the accuracy of identification by providing an alibi, presenting DNA evidence, or pointing out inconsistencies in eyewitness testimony. Because eyewitness misidentification can easily occur, proving it can cast significant doubt on the prosecution’s case, potentially leading to an acquittal.

Presenting a Duress Defence

A duress defence contends that you carried out the robbery due to an immediate threat of harm to yourself or others. For this defence to succeed, the threat must have been serious and immediate and left you with no reasonable alternative but to comply. If the duress defence is proven, it can lead to a stay of proceedings, as your actions were not voluntary.

Highlighting Insufficient Evidence

Challenging the prosecution’s evidence is a fundamental defence strategy in robbery cases. The defence will scrutinise the evidence for inconsistencies, gaps, or weaknesses, aiming to create reasonable doubt about your guilt. If the prosecution cannot prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt, your defence can argue for an acquittal based on insufficient evidence.

Invoking Charter Rights Violations

If your Charter rights were violated during the investigation or arrest—such as through illegal searches or not being informed of your right to counsel—any evidence obtained as a result may be excluded from the trial. This can significantly weaken the prosecution’s case. If the excluded evidence is crucial, it could lead to a stay of proceedings, effectively ending the case against you.

Role of a Criminal Defence Lawyer in Robbery Cases

Initial Consultation and Ongoing Representation
An experienced criminal defence lawyer begins by conducting an initial consultation, gathering details about the case, and providing preliminary advice. Throughout the legal process, the lawyer offers continuous representation, ensuring that your rights are protected at every stage.

Thorough Case Analysis and Evidence Collection
Your defence lawyer conducts a comprehensive analysis of your case, which includes collecting evidence, interviewing witnesses, and reviewing police reports. This meticulous preparation is essential for building a strong defence.

Developing a Tailored Defence Strategy
Based on the specifics of your case, the lawyer crafts a tailored defence strategy. This may involve exploring defences such as alibi, lack of intent, challenging identification, duress, or Charter rights violations, depending on what best suits the circumstances.

Court Representation and Plea Negotiation
In court, your lawyer will present your defence case, cross-examine witnesses, and challenge the admissibility of evidence, all while leveraging their deep understanding of legal procedures. Additionally, they may engage in plea negotiations to potentially secure a more favourable outcome for the client.

Advocating for Alternative Sentencing
If a conviction seems likely, your lawyer will advocate for alternative sentencing options, such as probation or rehabilitation, aiming to minimise the impact on you and promote a more constructive resolution.

Penalties and Consequences for a Robbery Conviction

Robbery is a very serious offence in Canada, carrying severe penalties that can vary depending on the specifics of the crime. Factors such as the use of firearms, involvement with criminal organisations, and other aggravating circumstances can significantly increase the severity of the sentence.

Penalties for Using Firearms in Robbery

Robbery involving firearms is treated as a straight indictable offence in Canada, with a maximum penalty of life imprisonment. The use of a restricted or prohibited firearm, or any firearm in connection with a criminal organisation, carries particularly severe consequences, including mandatory minimum sentences. 

For a first offence involving a restricted or prohibited firearm, the minimum sentence is 5 years imprisonment, increasing to 7 years for a second offence (involving any firearm). If the firearm is not restricted or prohibited, the minimum sentence is 4 years. In cases involving serious injury, individuals may be designated as dangerous offenders, which can lead to indefinite imprisonment.

Penalties for Subsequent Offences

Individuals with prior convictions face harsher penalties if convicted of robbery again. Repeat offenders, particularly those with previous robbery convictions or offences involving firearms, can expect longer sentences. For example, prior convictions for serious crimes like manslaughter, attempted murder, or sexual assault with a weapon can lead to significantly increased penalties upon a new robbery conviction, reflecting the severity of repeat criminal behaviour.

Aggravating Factors for Sentencing

When determining sentences for robbery, the court considers various aggravating factors that can lead to more severe penalties. Key factors include:

  • Involvement of Weapons: The presence and type of weapon, such as a firearm or knife, increase the potential for harm and result in harsher sentences.
  • Degree of Violence: Excessive violence, threats, or intimidation beyond what is necessary to commit the robbery can significantly elevate the sentence.
  • Degree of Planning and Premeditation: A carefully planned robbery is generally viewed as more serious than an impulsive one.
  • Injuries to Victims or Bystanders: Harm caused to victims or bystanders during the robbery is a major aggravating factor.
  • Targeting Vulnerable Victims: Offences against vulnerable individuals, such as the elderly or disabled, are treated with increased severity.
  • Criminal History: A prior criminal record, especially for similar offences, can lead to more stringent sentencing.
  • Value of Stolen Items: Higher-value thefts can result in harsher penalties.

The judge weighs these factors to determine the appropriate sentence, with each factor potentially increasing the severity of the punishment.

Contact an Experienced Criminal Lawyer Today

If you or someone you know is facing robbery charges, it is crucial to seek the advice of an experienced criminal defence lawyer immediately. Early legal intervention is vital in such serious cases to protect your rights and begin building a strong defence. Wiebe Criminal Defence is dedicated to providing top-tier legal representation, with extensive experience specifically in handling robbery cases. 

The firm is committed to thoroughly investigating each case, gathering evidence, interviewing witnesses, and identifying weaknesses in the prosecution’s case. Contact Wiebe Criminal Defence today to secure experienced and dedicated legal support.

Questions About Robbery Charges

What is the difference between theft, robbery and burglary?

Theft, robbery, and burglary are distinct crimes under Canadian law. While all three involve unlawfully taking property, they can be distinguished as follows: Theft involves taking property with the intent to steal, typically without the use of violence. Robbery is a more serious offence, as it combines theft with violence or the threat of violence. Burglary, known as “break and enter” in Canada, involves unlawfully entering a place with the intent to commit theft or another crime. The key differences lie in the use of force or violence (robbery) and unlawful entry (burglary), making these crimes more severe than theft alone.

Is it possible to have a robbery charge amended or dismissed?

Yes, a robbery charge can be amended or dismissed in certain situations. The likelihood of achieving this depends on various factors related to the specifics of the case. These factors include weak or insufficient evidence, a lack of intent, or mistaken identity. Demonstrating these issues can weaken the prosecution’s case, potentially leading to a reduction in charges or a full dismissal. Successful plea bargaining with the prosecution may also result in amended charges. However, each case is unique, and outcomes depend on the specifics of the situation and the strength of the defence.

How will prior convictions affect a new robbery charge?

Prior convictions, especially for violent offences or similar crimes like theft, can lead to harsher penalties, difficulties with bail, and less favourable outcomes in negotiations and court proceedings. The Criminal Code imposes mandatory minimum sentences for repeat offenders, meaning individuals with previous convictions are also likely to face longer sentences and more severe consequences. The court considers the criminal history when determining the sentence, and a pattern of similar offences can result in significantly increased penalties.